The User Experience of Presentations

(这篇纯粹是为了给公司的blog交差。基本上就是写这篇的过程让我幡然醒悟,写这么长的文章是一件吐血也不减膘的事,不能常干…)

Four hours of my plane trip to the east coast last week were spent reading the book “Slide:ology.” The book is written by a very successful female entrepreneur in the bay area: Nancy Duarte. She was one of the first of a few people to re-evaluate the value of slides and presentations, and to try and save people from boring and useless presentations. Over the years, people like her and Garr Reynolds have done some great work in this field to educate people about the importance of presentations, and to improve the User Experience of Presentations.

Isn’t making a presentation just to put up a bunch of slides, mostly just copying and pasting content from an existing report, and highlighting a few titles? When it comes to presenting it, no worries, I’ve already put all the things that I want to cover on the slides and I’ll have my notes with me! Incorporating design concepts in powerpoint slides? Isn’t using a company template or adding a few images enough for that? How long do I usually spend in making a presentation? Two hours at most!

Do some of the above thoughts “resonate” with you? If the answer is yes, your audience might not be getting some good presentation user experience ;)

Having been a graduate student, I had a few experiences going to big conferences. As a conference attendee, when you have up to 10 or even 20 presentations to choose from during one time slot, besides being totally overwhelmed by the great variety of topics, you want to spend your time listening to talks that you think might be the most valuable ones. I remember choosing to go to some talks because the topics were pretty eye catchy. Then 5 minutes later, I had to step out because I didn’t think I could make it for the full 20 minutes of the presentation. Indeed, 5 minutes, from the moment I sat down and tried to listen, to the moment I was convinced that the talk, the topic or even the presenter was not engaging or interesting and it wasn’t worth it for me to spend 20 minutes sitting there, that was the level of tolerance I could give to a presentation, and I might not be the toughest audience to please.

Would those talks potentially be useful to me? Of course, I might have missed out on a lot of great information and research ideas by not staying until the end. However, the valuable information apparently has not been presented in a more engaging way. In this world where peoples’ attention span is significantly shortened by 140 words twitter posts and 5 minutes Youtube videos, you really cannot ask your audience to sit through a boring talk. Or maybe you could have them physically be there, but you might get a lot of tweets or Facebook post feedback afterward that you don’t want to read :P

In a sense, the bad presentation user experience is very similar to a bad website user experience. In one of the usability studies we just finished here in EchoUser, the website we tested had great resources and content for users. However, the users were complaining that they could not get the information in a more efficient way, and they didn’t want spend hours going through each page on the website to learn those resources. In that case, they would just close the website and never come back again. One of the user quotes was “I don’t want to get an MBA on this.”

Indeed, no one wants to get an MBA on your presentation, unless you are a professor and your audience are the students who actually want to get a degree out of this. So the user experience of your presentation, or in other words, how the audience feels about and what users will get out from your talk, is like this road you build between you and your audience.  Are you building a wide “highway” or a narrow “country road”? Does it have good “road and traffic condition”? Those are crucial questions to ask to see if you are taking your users on the road and heading to their destination.

How can the user experience of presentations be improved? The above mentioned books have longer and more detailed answers for the question. In this post, let’s just summarize them in three basic steps: structure, design and presentation. Interestingly, the idea of user centered design keeps appearing in those steps.

Step 1: Structure

You do have a great product or a brilliant idea to sell, but putting up the product information or using different adjectives to describe your product might not be the most convincing way to sell your content. Your presentation needs to a STRUCTURE. It does not need to be fancy, your first goal is to clearly layout:

A. What is the issue you are trying to solve here?
B. Why is the issue important?
C. What is your solution? How does it work?
D. How the future will be changed because of your solution?

Remember those advertisements which you watched and couldn’t figure out what the products were? You don’t want your audience to feel confused about what messages you are trying to get across. Too often, presenters forget to deliver the content step by step because they know about the content too well. They are not making the presentation from the audiences’ viewpoint (they need some User Centered Design here). Going through the questions listed above will help users to sort out a clear “storyline” from your content, and make the presentation easier for audience to follow. Nancy Duarte has provided some brilliant ideas in her book Resonate on how to creatively and organically organize your content. At this step, you should be the director of your presentation content.

Step 2: Design

Again, think as if you are the audience (user) of the presentation, and ask the following questions: do you want to see a slide full of text? when you see a slide full of text, do you pay more attention to this text or to the presenter? do you feel convinced when you see cheesy images on slides?  Are you confident that you can read text that is smaller than 12 point font on slides? …

In front of the blank powerpoint slide, everybody should be and can be a designer. Besides copying and pasting, consider how your audience’s experience will be when looking at your slide. If your answer is “No” to any of the questions above, then don’t do that to your users. Don’t let them struggle between trying to read your slides and trying to listen to your talk. If you do have a lot of content to cover, print the slides out as hand-outs, and give them out before the presentation, but keep the presentation slides simple. The book that I read on flight Slide:ology is a great book for people who do not have design background to learn those crucial but are often neglected design rules in slide design. Sometimes, thinking as a designer when making your slides could be as basic as pick Sans Serif fonts (e.g. Arial, Tahoma or Century Gothic) as opposed to Serif (e.g. Georgia, Times New Roman, Courier).

Step 3: Present

Presenting your slides in front of an audience is essentially the process of doing public speaking, which might be the most difficult part to improve in the presentation flow. Think about JFK’s speech, think about Steve Jobs’ Apple product release keynotes, think about those inspring TED talks you watched, one common point is that the passionate or strategic ways presenters deliver the content made the presentation itself more engaging. The audience would laugh, applaud or even smile in tears following the presenter’s tempo.

As a presenter, a speaker, it might be impossible for you to turn yourself into a charming presenter as JFK, Ronald Reagan, Richard Feynman or Steve Jobs in a week. However, it IS possible that you could use a week to know all your content by heart and keep practicing, even if it’ll just be a 20 minutes conference talk. Garr Reynolds is another big name in the field of presentation design/training, he’s latest book “The Naked Presenter” clearly sets the focus on “be a prepared presenter.” According to his experience, the most effective way for people to stay calm, natural and confident in a presentation is to familiarize themselves with the content as much as possible. When you see a presenter who’s reading his notes a lot, or pause for too long in between slides, that’s a sign showing he’s not fully prepared. How would you feel as an audience if the actor stage could not remember his lines?

Different people might have their different approach to organize and deliver their ideas and thoughts in a presentation. The process might not be like the 3-step flow I proposed above based on my take aways from those presentation design books. However, I do believe it is useful to bring the user experience or user centered design concepts in designing presentations. Instead of forcing users’ to close their laptops during presentations, try to value your audience and create an engaging presentation and communication experience for them. Creating a better presentation user experience = Making you voice heard in a better way!

决定以后少写长文章

有些日子没更新blog了,不是没有东西写,而是想落笔的都是只言片语,每每开个头,就觉得要写上好几个大自然段才可以把事情讲得清楚,把情绪思路宣泄完整,最后的结果就是wordpress的草稿箱里压了好些残篇,发又发不了,懒又懒得死,就这样虎头蛇尾着,久而久之就忘了当初那些还没抒发完的到底是什么了…

当然也可以把只言片语post到weibo, facebook, buzz, twitter之类的地方。对了,两周前整了个weibo帐号(代代糖),看这新鲜劲儿能到哪天吧,有兴趣的可以follow我在上面灌水。我发现我在某个平台上灌水的频率往往是与我在这个平台上熟人的数量成反比的。想当年本科我在xiaonei上灌校内状态,灌校内日志,我的校内账号还没那么多不认识的“好友”;刚来美国在facebook上灌水,狂发照片的时候,facebook的好友也寥寥可数;buzz也是一样,在还只有十个以内buzzer的时候,特乐衷与大家互相buzz comment对方的状态,可现如今,每个状态一发出去就到几百个人的page上去的时候,还真得想想才知道发某些content合不合适,至于个人生活照,有鉴于首先自己也不是大美女,转吆喝帖缺了点资本,其次在大庭广众之下,自恋帖缺了点勇气,最后,在美国待了两三年,老给国内朋友们面前发美国各种人情风土,炫耀帖缺了脸皮厚度,所以索性就发帖频率江河日下…

所以现在我weibo上都还没“关注”几个人,正状态照片灌得欢着呢… 只是,不管什么样的状态平台,总让人有一种,自己传递的信息,被其他人的评论,和整个大平台淹没的感觉,没有自己的独立存在感,更别提对自己痕迹的拥有感和保存感了,最不能忍的是,我一看到“新鲜事””news feed”此类版面,顿时大脑就无法思考了,除了一遍一遍的八卦花痴大家的状态或status,偶尔评论一下,一点创造性的工作都没法做。还是blog让人觉得有归属感。

(看,我又要把一篇quick post写成full post了… 还不赶紧打住!)

总而言之,此篇post的中心思想就是要将以后发文的style修改为”能短不长“,并且”今日事,今日毕“,少点废话,多点quality,Claudia的The Sanctuary Blog是我的榜样,什么时候即使被工作或是论文逼到墙角了,也能放个一二十分钟写篇blog才睡觉了,then i am accomplishing something big…

姐把话放这儿了,注意,是少写长文章,不是不写。

行了,大家监督吧!

修辞格未亡 且看乔不死如何玩转


现如今,“小清新”当道,强附的“修辞”往往常常容易背上“做作” 、“恶意游说”的黑锅。但在我看来,这不过是可以被运用的一种语言工具罢了。运用得法,必可得所。Presentation之神-乔不死大叔,可谓将白话与修辞都玩转。下面几个在presentation中精妙运用“修辞”的例子都来自于乔大叔2007的iPhone发布会,两个字,牛掰(Simply Brilliant).

1. Anaphora(首词重复法):用同样的词语/句式开启每句话

“As you know, we’ve got the iPod, best music player in the world. We’ve got the iPod Nanos, brand new models, colors are back. We’ve got the amazing new iPod Shuffle.”

你知道,我们有iPod,全世界最好的音乐播放器;我们有iPod Nanos,全新的黑色模型;我们也有这个棒极了的新iPod Shuffle。

2. Epiphora(尾词重复法): 用同样的词语/句式结束每句话

“Well, these are their home screens. And again, as you recall, this is the iPhone’s home screen. This is what their contacts look like. This is what iPhone’s contacts look like.”

是的,这就是他们(iPod)的主屏幕;然后,正如你所记得的,这是iPhone的主屏。这是他们(iPod)的联系簿;而这些,是iPhone的联系簿(个中奥妙各位看管就自己琢磨吧…)

3. Symploke(首尾呼应): 首词重复和尾词重复的结合

In 1984, we introduced the Macintosh, it didn’t just change Apple, it changed the whole computer industryIn 2001, we introduced the first iPods, and…it didn’t just change the way we all listen to music, It changed the entire music industry.”

1984 年,我们推出了Macintosh(苹果电脑),它不仅改变了苹果作为一家企业,它改变了整个个人电脑行业;2001年,我们推出了iPod,它不仅改变了我们听音乐的方式,它改变了整个音乐工业。

4. Germinatio: 同一句中的意群重复

“That’s 58 songs every second of every minute of every hour of every day.”

(描述iPod的长时间播放功能)每天,每小时,每分钟,每秒,不停的播放58首歌。

“And so I’ve got voice mail how I wanna listen to it, when I wanna listen to it, in any order I wanna listen to it with visual voice mail.”

而且我有语音信箱,我怎么听呢,当我想听的时候,我可以按任意顺序来听,并且附带图像提示的来听。

5. Anadiplosis:(反复法):以上句结尾开启下句

“And they garnered two percent market shareTwo percent market share. iPod had 62 percent market share, and the rest had 36.”

他们获得了两个百分点的市场份额,两个百分点,而iPod占据了62个百分点,其他的则是剩下的36个百分点

6. Asyndeton(连接词省略法):省略掉并列的词组中的连接词

“We’ve got movies, TV shows, music, podcasts, photos.”

我们有电影,电视节目,音乐,广播节目,相片。

7. Polysyndeton (连接词重复法):在一系列词组和从句中重复连接词

“It’s got everything from Cocoa and the graphics and it’s got core animation built in and it’s got the audio and video that OSX is famous for.”

它拥有所有Cocoa和图像处理的功能,并且它拥有核心动画处理功能,并且它拥有享有盛誉的苹果操作系统的音视频处理功能。

8. Interrogatio(反问):一个具有提示性答案的修辞性问句

“Isn’t that incredible?” 这个不是很diao吗?
“Want to see that again?” 是不是还想再看一遍?
“Pretty cool, huh?” 挺酷的吧,哈?

9. Exclamatio(感叹):表达演讲者强烈情绪的感叹

“I just take my unit here, and I turn it landscape mode, oh, look what happens! I’m in cover flow.”

我只需要选择这个,并且将它调整为平视模式,wow, 快看看怎么了,我变成了cover flow了!

“Wha, whoa, what is this?”

哦,等等,等等,这是什么啊?!(老美们最喜欢用这个句式来假装惊讶…类似于中文里的“呦,呦~~~ 什么东风把您吹来了啊” :P

10. Aporia: 一个假造的疑问,引发观众来揣测演讲者的下一步行动

“Now, how are we gonna communicate this? We don’t wanna carry around a mouse, right? What are we gonna do?”

那么现在,我们怎么来实现这个功能呢?我们可不想到处拿着个鼠标,是吧?那我们要怎么做呢?

11. Hyperbole: 将某件事物或者情境夸张到极致

“Best version of Google Maps on the planet, widgets, and all with Edge and Wi-Fi networking.”

这是地球上最好版本的谷歌地图(apparently not any more with the android phones lol)!

12. Antitheton: 两件事物强烈的比较

“The kind of things you would find on a typical phone, but in a very untypical way now.”

你所能在一个普通手机上找到的功能,都会在(iphone)上以一个不普通的方式呈现。

13. Metaphor: 以比喻来比较不同事物

“A huge heart transplant to Intel microprocessors.”

给英特尔的微处理器做一个大型心脏移植手术

14. Climax: 将一句话铺垫得从弱转强

“First was the mouse. The second was the click wheel. And now, we’re gonna bring multi-touch to the market.”

首先是鼠标,接着我们有了触摸式转盘(ipod上用来选择歌曲的部分),现在,我们将多点触屏推向市场。

15. Personification:  将人的某些特征拟人化的表现在事物上

It already knows how to power manage….and if there’s a new message it will tell me.”

它(iphone)自己就知道如何进行电源能量管理… 如果有新信息进来,它也会告诉我。

16. Slogans 标语: 大叔也有他标语性的台词,他会将它们一遍又一遍的重复。这些都是事先设计好的,像“重新发明手机”(reinvent the phone)这样的标语在苹果召开的媒体发布会上也多有提及。

“Today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone, and here it is.” 今天,苹果将重新发明手机,这就是它!

“So, we’re gonna reinvent the phone.” 所以,我们将会重新发明手机。

“We wanna reinvent the phone.” 我们希望重新发明手机。

“…You’ll agree, we have reinvented the phone.” 你也会同意,我们已经重新发明了手机。

“ Today Apple is reinventing the phone.” 今天,苹果重新发明手机!

(仔细分析一下 其实跟新闻联播和春晚不断重复一个概念没太大区别…)

(转自Duarte Design Blog,翻译中也加入了Sally一些观点)

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.